Endorphina Casinos in the UK: What to Verify
Available in GBProvider information alone cannot confirm which UK casinos offer Endorphina games or what terms apply to real-money play.
Table of Contents
- Endorphina Slots in the UK: What Can Be Verified
- Endorphina Games and the Limits of the Available Evidence
- Checking Casino Availability Without an Endorphina Operator List
- Real-Money Play, Mobile Access and Free-Play Claims
- Deposits and Welcome Offers: Check the Casino’s Own Terms
- RTP and Variance: Why a Provider Name Is Not Enough
- Software Supply, Licensing and UK Casino Responsibility
- Gaming Software Versus a Consumer Casino
- Provider Identity and Distribution: What Amatic’s History Shows
- Bonus and Payment Claims Need Casino-Level Verification
Endorphina Slots in the UK: What Can Be Verified
The key distinction is between a game provider and the casinos that make its games available. It does not establish which UK casinos offer Endorphina slots. Amatic’s distribution arrangements cannot be treated as evidence about Endorphina, and a casino associated with one provider should not be assumed to carry another.
That distinction matters if you are looking for a place to play Endorphina games. A provider’s name, a casino’s game catalogue and the availability of a particular title are separate things. Evidence about one does not automatically settle the others. In particular, an account of Amatic’s presence among UK operators cannot support a list of casinos with Endorphina slots.
What the Amatic information establishes
Amatic Industries GmbH was founded in Austria in 1993 and supplies gaming software to businesses rather than operating a casino for consumers. Its games reach UKGC-licensed operators through direct integrations or aggregator feeds. They are not sold as a standalone consumer product.
These details describe one provider’s business model. They help explain how Amatic games can appear within casino services, but they do not identify Endorphina as a supplier to any particular operator. Nor do they show that a casino carrying Amatic games also carries Endorphina titles. The provider names are not interchangeable.
If you’re looking for UK casinos featuring Endorphina games, payout timing is one practical detail to consider. Use this list as a starting point and check each casino’s current terms before you play.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days Dieselwin is listed with a payout speed of 1–3 business days, giving you a stated timeframe to consider.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days Britsino is listed with a payout speed of 1–3 business days. You can use this as a reference when reviewing its withdrawal terms.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days EvoSpin has a listed payout speed of 1–3 business days, a useful detail for your withdrawal planning.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days WinBeast is listed with a payout speed of 1–3 business days. Check the casino’s terms for the conditions that apply to withdrawals.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days SpinFormula has a listed payout speed of 1–3 business days, so you have a stated timeframe to keep in mind.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days NightWin is listed with a payout speed of 1–3 business days. You may want to confirm the applicable withdrawal terms before playing.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days Revery Play has a listed payout speed of 1–3 business days, which gives you a timeframe to consider when assessing withdrawals.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days Zombillion is listed with a payout speed of 1–3 business days. Review its terms to understand any conditions that may apply.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days Amunbet has a listed payout speed of 1–3 business days, a stated detail you can factor into your choice.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days BeOnBet is listed with a payout speed of 1–3 business days. Check its current withdrawal terms for further details.
For a reader comparing UK casino catalogues, that is a practical limit. A provider’s route into the market says something about that provider’s distribution, not about every software company or every game available at the same casino. The relevant question is whether the specific operator currently offers the specific Endorphina title you want. Amatic’s arrangements do not answer it.
Why provider names need careful reading
Casino pages and game menus can make provider names seem like shorthand for a whole catalogue. They are not. A casino may work with multiple suppliers, and the presence of one supplier’s games does not establish the presence of another’s. Likewise, seeing a provider mentioned in a general description does not by itself confirm that a particular game is available to customers.
The same care applies to the wording around Endorphina. “Endorphina slots” can mean the provider’s games in general, while “an Endorphina slot at a UK casino” makes a more specific claim about a title and an operator. Those claims require different evidence. Information about Amatic can support statements about Amatic; it cannot fill the gap between those two Endorphina claims.
This is not a technicality. If you are choosing a casino because you want to play a particular provider’s games, the provider’s identity is part of the selection criterion. A casino that carries software from another supplier may still be worth considering for other reasons, but that does not make it an Endorphina casino. Better for what? The answer depends on the game catalogue you actually want.
A useful boundary for comparison
Treat any claim about Endorphina availability as needing Endorphina-specific confirmation. Amatic’s verified position in the UK market is useful context only when the subject is Amatic. It cannot verify Endorphina’s UK casino partners, establish that Endorphina games are included in an operator’s catalogue, or identify a particular Endorphina slot at a UK casino.
That boundary also prevents a common comparison error: transferring a familiar provider’s credentials or distribution route to a different name. A supplier can be established, licensed for its own role, or distributed through particular channels without that telling you anything about another supplier. The conclusion must stay attached to the name the evidence actually concerns.
So, when assessing Endorphina slots in the UK, keep the provider and operator distinct. Amatic is an Austrian B2B supplier whose games are distributed to UKGC-licensed operators through direct integration or aggregator feeds. That is a concrete description of Amatic. It is not a directory of Endorphina games, casinos or partnerships. A precise comparison begins by refusing to blur those categories.
Endorphina Games and the Limits of the Available Evidence
A provider name is not a description of a game. That matters if you are comparing slots by features: a familiar-sounding theme or a casino’s provider label cannot tell you how a particular game pays, what its symbols do, or whether it includes a bonus round.
Attention: Treating a general description of one provider as a template for another can lead to unsupported claims about a game’s features or mechanics.
Treating it as one would turn a statement about one provider into an unsupported claim about another.
What the Amatic description does—and does not—tell you
A typical Amatic video slot is described as having five reels and three rows, with nine or ten fixed paylines. Scatter symbols can pay, and a free-spin feature may use a “Book of” theme. These are useful details when discussing the usual format associated with Amatic. They do not establish that an Endorphina game has the same layout, payline structure, scatter rules or free-spin feature.
The difference is not cosmetic. Reel count describes the visible grid; paylines describe routes along which winning combinations may be evaluated; scatter rules and free spins concern separate game functions. Knowing these characteristics for Amatic gives you no sound basis for filling in the corresponding details for Endorphina. The same caution applies to themes and feature names: resemblance is not confirmation.
So a comparison of Endorphina titles by bonus mechanics, reel layout or payline count cannot be made responsibly from the Amatic description. Nor can a supposed “best” Endorphina game be selected on those criteria. A ranking needs identifiable games and a stated measure of comparison. Without both, a list would look precise while saying very little.
How to judge a named game
When a casino presents a game as an Endorphina title, use the game’s own information panel as the starting point. Check the displayed title and provider, then read the rules attached to that specific game. The rules should explain the symbols, winning combinations, special features and how any bonus round works. Those details belong to the named title, not to a general assumption about its developer.
If a feature is important to you, look for its description in the game itself rather than inferring it from another provider’s slots. For instance, a “Book of” feature should not be assumed simply because a different company’s games include one. The same goes for fixed paylines, scatter pays, free spins or any other mechanic. A provider’s name cannot substitute for the game rules.
This is a practical standard, not a demand for elaborate research. You need a title you can identify and rules that explain how it works. If either is unclear, there is no firm basis for comparing that game with another one on mechanics. A neat table cannot repair an uncertain entry.
Why a “best games” list would mislead
“Best” only has meaning against a criterion. You might care about a particular bonus feature, a simpler layout or a specific style of play. But a ranking of Endorphina games requires confirmed titles and reliable details about the features being ranked.
That limit also rules out borrowing Amatic characteristics to make an Endorphina comparison look complete. The Amatic format is a concrete description of that provider’s typical slot, not a template that can be applied across the industry. Two providers may publish games with overlapping features, but overlap must be established title by title. It cannot be presumed from a provider label.
- Use the game’s own information panel as a starting point
- Read the specific rules attached to the named title
- Verify bonus mechanics and reel layouts title by title
- Infer game features from a general provider label
- Use Amatic’s slot format as a template for Endorphina
- Assume a “Book of” feature exists based on other providers
For you, the useful conclusion is narrow: the Amatic slot format can be described, but it does not verify an Endorphina game or reveal its mechanics. Any Endorphina title should be assessed from its own rules and presentation. Until a specific game and its details are clear, claims about the best Endorphina slots would be guesswork dressed as comparison. A ranking needs evidence.
Checking Casino Availability Without an Endorphina Operator List
A list of UK casinos associated with one software provider cannot establish where another provider’s games are available. The operator names sometimes presented in connection with Amatic refer to Amatic titles, not Endorphina. Treating them as an Endorphina casino list would confuse two separate catalogues.
A specialist review named Betfred, Jackpotjoy, William Hill, kwiff, PokerStars, Ladbrokes, Paddy Power, Unibet, Virgin Games and Casumo in connection with Amatic games. That is a provider-specific listing, not evidence that these operators offer Endorphina. Nor does a name on a provider list confirm that every game from that provider is available in the casino lobby.
The distinction matters if you are looking for a complete list of Endorphina casinos in the UK. A list can only answer that question if it identifies the provider and has been checked against the operator’s current games or provider information. An old or general operator list may not reflect the present catalogue; a casino’s connection to one supplier does not establish a connection to another.
How to check an operator
For an individual UKGC-licensed casino, check its current provider list or search its games catalogue for Endorphina. If the provider is named, look for the specific title you want as well: provider availability does not guarantee that every title is included. Where the casino’s public information does not settle the point, ask its customer support to confirm whether the game is currently available to your account.
This is a practical check, not a recommendation of any operator. Availability can be specific to a casino and to an individual title, so a broad list may be useful as a starting point but cannot settle the question on its own. The same caution applies to a page labelled as a full Endorphina casino list: unless it shows how each entry was verified and distinguishes Endorphina from other providers, the label does not prove coverage.
What a provider name does—and does not—tell you
A casino’s provider directory is more useful than a list that merely groups operators together, but it still needs to match your actual search. Check that the entry says Endorphina, rather than Amatic or another supplier, then confirm the game itself in the casino’s lobby. If you are looking for a live casino, check the category and provider details directly; a slot provider’s name alone does not establish that it runs a live casino studio.
The words “Endorphina Industries” may also appear in searches for the provider, but a variation in the name does not change the verification test. You need an operator-level confirmation of Endorphina and, for a particular game, confirmation of that title. “Licensed Endorphina casino” is not a substitute for checking the operator’s status and its current catalogue: provider identity and casino availability are separate details.
How to check an operator
Check the casino’s current provider list or search the games catalogue specifically for Endorphina.
If the provider is named, look for the specific game title you want to ensure it is included.
If public information is unclear, ask customer support to confirm if the game is available to your account.
A specialist review also advised staff at UKGC-licensed operators to consult the operator’s current provider information before depositing when checking for Amatic titles, because individual availability had not been confirmed. That advice illustrates why a provider list should be checked at casino level; it does not verify Endorphina availability. For this search, the decisive evidence is a current Endorphina entry and the specific game you intend to play. Anything less is a lead, not a confirmed list.
Real-Money Play, Mobile Access and Free-Play Claims
Real-money access, mobile compatibility and demo play are separate questions. A game can load on a phone without being offered for real money, and a casino may offer a demo without that proving the game is available in its real-money lobby. The provider name alone does not settle any of these points.
That describes Amatic games, not Endorphina slots. It cannot establish whether an Endorphina game runs in a mobile browser, needs an app, or is offered by a UK casino. Do not treat one supplier’s technical setup as a shortcut to conclusions about another.
Real-money play
For real-money play in Great Britain, the casino offering the game must hold a UKGC licence. That requirement applies to the operator, not to a phone, browser or game-provider label. If you are checking whether an Endorphina title can be played for real money, the relevant point is whether a UKGC-licensed casino actually lists that title for real-money play. A provider name on a casino’s general software page is not enough to confirm the status of a particular game.
This distinction matters because “available on mobile” and “available for real-money play” do not mean the same thing. A title could be compatible with a device but absent from the casino’s playable catalogue; conversely, a title in the catalogue may have access conditions shown by the operator. Check the individual game listing and the operator’s terms before treating either claim as settled.
Mobile and demo access
A mobile-browser claim needs to be tied to the specific Endorphina game and casino, rather than borrowed from Amatic’s HTML5 setup. Look for the game launching in your device’s browser and check whether the operator identifies any app or software requirement. Avoid assuming that a desktop listing guarantees the same access on a phone.
Demo play is another distinct feature. A free-play or demo option lets you try a game without staking money, if the operator provides that option; it does not confirm real-money availability. Nor does the existence of free spins establish that a demo mode exists. Those are different forms of access, and each needs confirmation on the casino’s own game page.
For Endorphina, the same standard applies to claims about mobile slots, demo versions and real-money casino play: verify the named game and the operator’s current listing. Amatic’s browser-based play is useful only as an Amatic-specific detail. It cannot serve as proof of Endorphina compatibility or access.
A tidy comparison should therefore keep three columns separate: real-money listing, mobile launch, and demo availability. If an operator confirms only one, record only one. Otherwise, a familiar provider name can make a blank cell look filled. Not the same thing.
Real-money listing, mobile launch, and demo availability are distinct features; if an operator confirms only one, only that specific status should be recorded.
Deposits and Welcome Offers: Check the Casino’s Own Terms
A casino’s deposit rules and welcome offer belong to the operator, not the game provider. Amatic Industries does not take bets from British players; the casino is responsible for handling deposits and payouts, setting bonus terms and providing customer support. That division matters when you are comparing an Endorphina game’s availability with an offer: seeing a provider’s name does not establish who qualifies for a promotion or what its conditions are.
For a first-deposit offer, check the casino’s terms for eligibility, the qualifying payment method, any minimum deposit, the games that count towards wagering, and the time allowed to meet the conditions. These details can differ between operators and offers. A promotion that appears alongside a slot is not necessarily restricted to that provider’s games, and a provider’s presence in a casino does not make you eligible for the casino’s welcome offer.
The same applies to claims about no-deposit bonuses. Treat “no deposit” as a specific offer condition to confirm in the operator’s own terms, not as a feature of Endorphina games. Check whether registration or another eligibility condition applies, which games are included, and whether winnings are subject to wagering or withdrawal restrictions. The offer label alone does not answer those questions.
For UK players, the UK Gambling Commission’s cap on wagering requirements for bonus funds took effect on 19 December 2025. When assessing a UK casino promotion, compare its stated requirements with that rule and read the full terms rather than relying on a headline. Bonus eligibility remains an operator-level matter; it cannot be inferred from the software supplier or the title you intend to play.
If an offer advertises a low minimum deposit, verify the amount and payment conditions on the casino’s own promotion and cashier pages before registering. Do not assume that a figure in a promotional headline applies to every payment method or to every customer. The operator’s terms are the relevant place to check.
A useful comparison separates the questions into two columns: game provider and offer conditions. The first identifies whose software is being offered; the second records the operator’s eligibility rules, deposit requirement and bonus restrictions. Keeping those criteria apart prevents an Endorphina label—or an Amatic example—from being mistaken for evidence about a casino’s current promotion. No shortcut there.
RTP and Variance: Why a Provider Name Is Not Enough
A provider’s name does not tell you the return of a particular slot. RTP is tied to the game version offered, so the figure to compare is the one shown for that title at the casino where you intend to play. A provider-wide average would not tell you what applies to an individual game.
A specialist review reported that the Amatic slot The Book of Aztec has RTP versions of 90.57% and 97.63%. The same game can therefore be listed with different returns at different casinos. Those figures describe versions of this Amatic title; they are not a benchmark for other providers, including Endorphina. The practical test is the game’s own information panel or the casino’s rules for that title, not the provider logo.
RTP Limitations
Theoretical RTP is calculated over extensive play and is not a guarantee of what you will receive in a single session.
RTP also has a narrow meaning. It is a theoretical return calculated over extensive play, not a promise about what you will receive in a session. A higher advertised RTP can be a useful comparison when two versions of the same game are otherwise identical, but it cannot predict your next result or establish which game will pay out most during a particular visit.
RTP is not volatility
Volatility, sometimes called variance, describes how wins tend to be distributed. A lower-volatility slot may produce smaller wins more often, while a higher-volatility game may have less frequent wins and larger swings. That description concerns the pattern of results, not the percentage returned over time. Two games with similar RTPs can feel very different in play.
This distinction matters when comparing Endorphina slots. A high RTP does not, by itself, mean low volatility, frequent wins, a large maximum win or a progressive jackpot. Those are separate characteristics and need to be confirmed in the specific game’s published details. “Best” depends on your criterion: advertised return, volatility, jackpot format or another feature. One label cannot answer all of those questions.
When comparing a title, check that the RTP figure belongs to the exact version offered, then look separately for information about volatility and any jackpot or maximum-win feature. If the casino displays a different figure from another listing, treat that as a reason to verify the game details rather than assuming one number applies everywhere. Slot data is version-specific. Provider branding is not a substitute for it.
For Endorphina, the same discipline applies: judge each named game by its own displayed specifications. Do not infer a highest-return title, an average across the catalogue, or a volatility category from the supplier’s name. A precise figure is useful only when it is attached to the game version you can actually access.
Software Supply, Licensing and UK Casino Responsibility
A provider’s UK status is specific to that provider. Amatic Industries GmbH holds a UK Gambling Software (Remote) licence under account number 47992, which has been active since 27 April 2017. That confirms Amatic’s authorisation to supply software under the terms of its licence; it says nothing about whether Endorphina holds a comparable licence or how its games reach UK casinos.
The distinction matters when you look for Endorphina casino software in the UK. A licence recorded for Amatic cannot be used as evidence about Endorphina’s software arrangements, distribution partners or presence in a casino’s game lobby. Nor does a provider’s name by itself tell you whether a particular operator is authorised to offer remote gambling to British customers. Those are separate questions, with separate licence holders to check.
For remote gambling offered to consumers in Great Britain, the UK Gambling Commission’s remit applies even when the equipment used to provide the service is based elsewhere. The Commission regulates gambling activity in the UK, including online casinos, and is the sole regulator for commercial gambling in Great Britain. The location of a company’s servers, therefore, does not remove a service aimed at Great Britain from the relevant regulatory framework.
Software and Licensing
- A software supplier’s licence does not establish the licensing position of the operators using its products
- The UKGC is the sole regulator for commercial gambling in Great Britain
- Verification requires checking the supplier’s arrangements, the operator’s licence, and the game’s availability
The Commission grants operating licences to businesses and personal licences to individuals performing regulated roles. Those are not interchangeable permissions. An individual’s personal licence does not authorise a casino business to serve customers, and a software supplier’s licence does not establish the licensing position of every operator using its products.
This is why an Endorphina casino software review should separate three checks: whether the supplier’s software arrangements are documented, whether the operator has the appropriate UKGC licence, and whether the specific game is available at that operator. The Amatic licence details answer only the question about Amatic. They cannot certify an Endorphina interface, a mobile casino using its games, or a free-play offering.
For you, the useful criterion is not simply whether a casino names a familiar software provider. It is whether the operator is authorised for the market and whether the particular product is actually offered there. A verified licence for one company cannot fill in the missing details for another.
That is the boundary.
Gaming Software Versus a Consumer Casino
A game provider and a casino occupy different places in the gambling process. A provider develops or supplies software; a consumer-facing casino gives players an account through which they can access games and place bets. Finding a provider’s name does not, by itself, identify a casino where you can play.
Amatic Industries is an example of the distinction. It is an Austrian business-to-business software supplier, founded in 1993, and it does not run a casino for consumers. It does not take bets from British players directly. The casino operator is the business that handles player accounts, deposits, payouts, bonus terms and customer support.
That division matters when you are assessing an Endorphina gaming casino in the UK. A provider name in a casino’s game catalogue would identify software, not the business accepting your custom. Equally, a company described as a gaming provider should not be treated as a casino site unless it actually operates a consumer-facing service. Those are separate roles, even when both names appear alongside the same slot.
Use the operator as your criterion when deciding whether a site is a place to play: it is the operator that deals with your account and any practical issue involving a bet or payout. Use the provider name to identify the software, not to infer who is responsible for your account. This applies whether you are comparing online casino sites, looking for free slots, or checking a title’s stated return. A provider label cannot answer those casino-level questions.
The distinction also puts searches for Endorphina slots into perspective. “Endorphina” in a page title or game listing would not, on its own, establish that the named business runs the casino, accepts UK players or handles withdrawals. Nor does Amatic’s business model prove that Endorphina has the same structure. Treating one supplier’s arrangements as evidence about another would mix up the very roles that need separating.
So, when a page presents a provider as though it were a place to play, look for the actual casino operator. The useful comparison is not provider versus provider, but software supplier versus the business serving the player. One makes games available to casinos; the other deals with the customer. Different jobs.
The difference between providers and casinos
A game provider develops and supplies the software, whereas a consumer-facing casino manages player accounts, deposits, payouts, and customer support. A provider’s name identifies the software, not the business responsible for your account.
Provider Identity and Distribution: What Amatic’s History Shows
A provider’s history can explain how its own products reached online casinos, but it cannot verify another company’s catalogue or UK distribution. Amatic Industries offers a documented example: the Austrian software business was founded in 1993 and later established its online gaming division, AMANET, around 2010. That history describes Amatic’s development, not Endorphina’s.
For readers comparing an Endorphina casino provider in the UK, the distinction matters. A provider name appearing in a casino lobby is not proof of how that software company was founded, when it entered online gaming, or which distribution arrangements it uses. Amatic’s AMANET launch supplies a specific point in that company’s timeline; it says nothing about Endorphina’s.
Amatic games reach UK operators through direct integrations or aggregator feeds. That is a useful illustration of how a software provider’s catalogue can be distributed across separate casino platforms. It does not mean every casino has the same titles, and an Amatic listing cannot establish that a platform also carries Endorphina slot games or software.
There is another distinction worth keeping in view: a casino lobby listing is an editorial indication of availability, not an entry in a regulatory register. Any UKGC-licensed operator may use a business-to-business arrangement involving Amatic, but the provider’s appearance on a casino’s site does not itself confer or confirm the casino’s operating status. The listing answers a narrower question: which provider a casino says it features.
That makes provider comparisons less tidy than a single brand label suggests. One line in a lobby can identify a supplier, while the route by which its games were integrated may involve a direct connection or an intermediary. For Endorphina, those details require Endorphina-specific confirmation; Amatic’s history is not a substitute.
The practical criterion is therefore evidence tied to the named company. Amatic’s record shows a long-established business that added an online division and distributes games through more than one technical route. It is a useful case study in provider development, not a proxy for an Endorphina online gaming provider in the UK. Similar names in casino menus do not make the companies interchangeable. Just a label.
Bonus and Payment Claims Need Casino-Level Verification
An Endorphina logo does not tell you whether a casino has a welcome offer, a no-deposit promotion or a deposit bonus. Those terms are set by the casino, not by the software provider. Treat a bonus as an operator-specific offer: check the casino’s own terms for eligible games, any wagering requirement, expiry conditions and withdrawal restrictions before you opt in.
The same test applies to claims about “best” offers. The useful comparison is not the headline value alone, but the conditions attached to it and whether the games you intend to play qualify. A promotion described as applying to a provider’s games should name the eligible titles or explain how to check them. Do not assume that an offer covers every game from a provider.
Payment methods also belong to the operator. A specialist review did not confirm a UKGC-licensed casino accepting cryptocurrency for Amatic play. For any casino, check its current cashier and terms directly; a provider name cannot establish whether Bitcoin or another cryptocurrency is accepted.
Be careful not to treat an offshore promotion as a UK alternative. Winstler, which holds a Curaçao licence, and MrJones, which is licensed in Anjouan, are examples of casinos carrying Amatic games outside the UK regulatory framework. Their presence does not make their bonuses or payment methods suitable substitutes for offers from UKGC-licensed operators. For British players, a legal online casino must hold a current UKGC licence.
A practical comparison is therefore operator first, offer second: confirm the casino’s UKGC status, then read the live promotion terms and payment rules on that casino’s own site. If an offer’s eligibility or withdrawal conditions are unclear, do not infer them from the game provider. The small print decides.
What is the RTP of Book of Aztec and other top Amatic slots?
Book of Aztec has RTP versions of 90.57% and 97.63%. The same game can have different RTP versions at different casinos.
What are the wagering requirements at Amatic casino bonuses in the UK?
UK rules cap wagering requirements on bonus funds at 10×. Some operators, including 32Red, Betfred and Bet365, offer free-spin wins with 0× wagering, so the winnings are credited as cash.
Do Amatic casinos work on mobile phones and tablets?
Yes, Amatic games generally run in a mobile browser as HTML5 games, without a download.
What is Amatic Industries and when was it founded?
Amatic Industries GmbH is an Austrian business-to-business gaming software supplier, founded in 1993. It supplies games to casino operators rather than running casinos for players.
Written by the editors at Doesnt-come-out.com.
